The Tech Billionaires Soft-Launching Secession in California — If these Silicon Valley plutocrats have their way, a swath of Solano County will be transformed into their own nation-state::If these Silicon Valley plutocrats have their way, a swath of Solano County will be transformed into their own nation-state.

  • mosiacmango
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The plus side is that they dumped ridiculous amounts of money into buying out all the land. Like 10x and more of the actual value. At least some family farmers got a big payday.

    These fucks should set up Wyoming or South Dakota. Low taxes, would actually bring value to the state, and they could probally flip the state to blue just with their own selves. Likely take too long to helicopter back to the valley though, so the billionares just totally had to set this up in California.

    • tsonfeir
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      No one from California wants to live in Wyoming or South Dakota. They’re willing to pay more.

      • mosiacmango
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Ohh yeah i get it, but at least that would be interesting. These fucks are just setting up a play city for billionaires where they own everything from the water to the sky in some byzantine “vertically integrated ownership of a human life” bullshit.

        Tge least they could do was make a tech mecha in Oklahoma, dump some money into rural states. Just get weird with it out in the wind blown plains, but nah.

        • tsonfeir
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The weather is shit in the Midwest, and as the climate gets worse, the Midwest is going to be wrecked with those northern winds. The western coast largely avoids those winds because of several mountain ranges and the ocean, keeping it from freezing over.

        • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          They would never do that in the Midwest or the South because, as much as they lobby for it, nobody wants to work in these regions due to:

          • Lower pay
          • Legislation making it impossible to get aid for abortion, affordable broadband, and healthcare, which leads into…
          • Incredibly poor cultural fit, which leads into…
          • Inability to poach or recruit to the region, which leads into…
          • Challenges executing corporate vision

          If they could, they would have already.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why would they pay to live somewhere that’s inconvenient, no one would want to live somewhere inconvenient this isn’t a billionaire thing, it’s just a human thing. I don’t get why you’re mad that they don’t want to live in Wyoming. Who does?

      • mosiacmango
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Im not mad, I just think it would be more intersting as a billionare to build a tech hub in a deeply rural state than 60 miles north of Frisco’. The dynamics and impact it would have to one of these deeply rural states would be fascinating.

        Setting up a vacation city a quick helicopters ride from your san fran penthouse is pretty mundane. If you want to do something stupid with your ill gotten gains, at least be interesting.