Y’know, assault is generally defined as causing a person to fear for their safety. What these cops were doing was absolutely assault, bumping into someone’s shoulder is not. Plus it kinda looks like a football play the aide, Freeland and the cop were playing.

  • SagifuriusOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    “But Harper” not relevant. Its a fucking cop issue though. The fucking arrogance in those eyes.

    • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s my whole fucking point, it’s not relevant. Jesus fucking christ I’m so exhausted by you people.

      • SagifuriusOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        10 months ago

        Said the guy who’s first line was “But Harper” when nobody was talking ideology other than fascist cop methodology

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think they were referring to the Toronto Sun being a right bias paper.

          • SagifuriusOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Doesn’t matter either, that article itself wasn’t showing any signs. Unless he thinks it wasn’t newsworthy, which definitely would show someone’s got a bias.

            • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              So there is a thing you can do, publish some non biased articles, then start publishing more and more radical stuff and try to use the neutral as a buffer.

              “Yeah , I am saying some crazy hateful shit, but look at my other articles, you can totally trust me and anyone saying different is just trying to discredit me.”

              • i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                That was not an article, it was just a list of overreactions by right-wing personalities.

              • SagifuriusOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                10 months ago

                That’s great. Now watch the video in the article

        • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          The article literally has quotes from PP saying this is what happens after 8 years of Trudeau. I’m not arguing with someone who can’t read their sources, this is literally what they want you to be arguing about instead of the fact that every PM in recent memory has used the RCMP as their personal protection squad.

          • SagifuriusOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I guess Harper is the one prevented me from sharing this article on Facebook? Aside from that, of course they have a Pierre quote, he’s the leader of the opposition. What I meant was, no one in this thread was making in about left or right till “BUT HAARPER” showed up. Like you expect me to say this shit is OK cause Harper did it? I don’t, I remember being pissed at his shit too.