• platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I really hate these headlines. “100 times more!!! Will somebody think of the children!!!”

      A better headline would express if this is actually concerning or not for our health. 100 times more than an insignificant quantity can still be an insignificant quantity.

      • Gabu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Let’s put it this way: it’s infinitely more plastic than would be in your body under natural circumstances.

        • Dagwood222
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          They want you to accept your role in a capitalist society. There’s no need for numerous public water fountains if you can pay for water, and since you’re not paying for the premium glass bottles, you should accept some microplastics.

      • Dagwood222
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Or, society could actually provide a lot of public fountains, but that might mean taxing the richest to the point where they only have enough money for a hundred lifetimes, instead of a thousand lifetimes.

    • zik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean bottled water even tastes like plastic so it should be no surprise to anyone.