• SGNL@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      LOL. Your source is an antivax hit piece, with a single quote about unknown efficacy in 2020 tied behind a whole slew of conspiracy logic.

      This is supposed to be painfully obvious?

      Dude…

      • Sagifurius
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, sure, just ignore the links and references, pretend google doesn’t exist, pretend you haven’t read anything or watched any tv in 2 years, dude.

        • SGNL@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Because “Google”, an antivax opinion hitpiece with a single source about efficacy (yes there are other sources about absolutely nothing to do with transmission and more about how poor antivax folks are demonized, cmon dude), and what everyone “just knows” from the last two years are magic arbiters of truth…

          Lol fuck off dude. Give me some actual sources/studies with no opinion whinging and I’ll bite.

          Until then, you’re the very thing you keep writing everything else off as, conspiratorial nonsense.

          • Sagifurius
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Always amazing how committed people are to believing lies. That “Hit piece” was literally riddled with links to sources.