In Kentucky, politicians are preparing to vote on a law that would authorize the use of force against unhoused people who are found to be camping on private property.

Republican politicians in Kentucky are rallying behind a new bill that would authorize the use of force—and potentially deadly force—against unhoused people who are found to be camping on private property. The bill would also criminalize unsanctioned homeless encampments and restrict cities and towns from preempting state laws.

The bill, known as the “Safer Kentucky Act,” or HB5, would target homelessness, drug possession and mental illness by drastically increasing criminal penalties for a range of offenses. Introduced last week by Republican state representative Jared Bauman, it already has 52 sponsors in Kentucky’s House of Representatives. A vote is scheduled for this week.

Advocates are most alarmed by one aspect of the “Safer Kentucky Act” in particular: an anti-homeless provision that would authorize violence by property owners on people camping on their property. The bill says the use of force is “justifiable” if a defendant believes that criminal trespass, robbery or “unlawful camping” is occurring on their property.

  • @calabast
    link
    284 months ago

    The bill says the use of force is “justifiable” if a defendant believes that criminal trespass, robbery, or “unlawful camping” is occurring on their property.

    Great, so not only does it let them shoot homeless people, it lets them do it even if they “believe” it’s happening. So you can just shoot someone on your property for no reason at all, and say “well, I though they were performing a robbery”.

    • Gormadt
      link
      fedilink
      114 months ago

      “They were scoping the place out to put up a tent, I had to shoot them officer.”

      “They didn’t have anything with them”

      “But I believed that was their purpose”

      “Alright, checks out, have a nice day sir.”

      • Somewhere in near future in Kentucky if this passes
      • Schadrach
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        The article doesn’t adequately describe the bill. You need to insert the bit where you asked them to leave and they threatened you with force in response.

        • Gormadt
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          So basically it’s your word vs the word of a dead man

          Gotcha

    • @CodeName@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      64 months ago

      They’re basically extending Castle Doctrine out to the sidewalk. Next they’ll add you car to the list and you get to shoot anyone who cuts you off or makes eye contact with you while driving. After that you’ll get a personal exclusivity zone and can shoot anyone who comes within ten feet of you in public as long as they look “homeless” (ie are poor and/or black).

    • metaStatic
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      isn’t gay panic a legal defense in the states? there are so many legal ways to murder someone over there what’s one more going to do?