• Wanderer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    Gosling maybe deserved a nomination. Robbie didn’t. In an equality world all is well.

    Yet some people, the orignal post, have an issue with that weirdly. I see no reason why I should change my opinion.

    I actually thought Barbie was fairly egalitarian and not about men doing something better and getting recognition for it. Also the oscars are separated by sex anyway so the post doesn’t make any sense. Robbie got bested by other women.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Your point/analysis isn’t the problem - the issue is the utter nonsense and reactionary bullshit underpinning it that you’re telegraphing for all to see. Your arse is showing, and I’m not sure you even realise it.

      I agree with your point, but agreeing with someone practically screaming such nonsense is a pretty good reason for me to second-guess myself.

      • Wanderer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s called satire. Guess it is too complicated for people nowadays. The message is exactly the same as the original message.

        Good job my arse is lovely! What a treat.

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Ah - it’s Schrodinger’s asshole - throw out dumb reactionary nonsense, self-victimisation and whining about the nebulous concept of “woke”, and if it’s not well recieved, it was satire.

          I’ll be charitable, put it down to Poe’s law, and recommend you give some kind of tell that you’re engaging in satire, because there was nothing in your post or what I saw of your post history that would indicate your nonsense isn’t sincerely believed.

          • Wanderer
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m not sure you understand what satire is.

            • Tom_Hanx_Hail_Satan@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I’m not sure you understand what satire is. If you do you do it right. This reads as failed sarcasim followed by a “its just a joke, bro” lazy deflection.

              • Wanderer
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                I’m not deflecting anything, not sure how it comes across like that. I made a satirical comment, explained it. I stand by it.

            • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yep - that, and not the dogshit takes you’re telegraphing behind that satire, which are validated almost immediately by a glance at your post history are the problem, Schrodinger.

              I’ll let you get back to sobbing about whatever the fuck woke is taking over and ruining everything for you.