Employers demonstrated their infidelity to their staff by paying loyal workers, on average, 7% less than new hires — 20 years ago, salaries were largely the same between new and longtime employees.

  • kobra
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    293
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    From the article:

    1. Salary
    2. Career growth
    • Sabata11792@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      9 months ago

      I dong get it. We bought them a pizza just like 12 million dollar consultant suggested. They are supposed to make the green line go up now.

    • Gloria@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      What is a totally reasonable demand. Ask a CEO if he would do his work if he would get paid peanuts.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      9 months ago

      The career growth is really amazing. I work at a unionized place that is required to fill positions internally before outside hires. When a senior employee retires from a top level position it will be filled by someone at the company. Typically someone in a mid level position. Then there’s a chain effect where now that mid level position is open that will go to entry level workers. The only outside hires tend to be for entry level jobs.

      It’s great because when you talk to the senior staff, almost all of them started at the bottom and worked their way up. This gives them better knowledge of how the whole operation works since they’ve done the jobs below them, and also a little empathy!

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I hate this kind of thing, it creates a hirarical culture instead of promoting people by merit. Basically younger people get screwed in favor of older people. It also means that nothing will ever change within the company.