• Call me Lenny/Leni
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Unless I misunderstand something, that sounds like it would defeat one of the core purposes of a fediverse. If there is no membership coordination, it at least seems like it would be less a council and more like what it would be if it was just a group of sites with a common goal.

    Are people downvoting what I was saying because they think I was asserting a statement of fact or because they disagree with that being how it should work (or because I used Scientology in my example)? Cue the line “this is why we can’t have nice things”.

    • PatMustard@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The fediverse isn’t any kind of council, it’s just sites which use the same protocol to put their information in a form they all understand. It is open by default.

      • Call me Lenny/Leni
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are implications to the protocol though, for example you and I can communicate despite being registered to different parts of the fediverse. The lack of any safeguards against a group being unruly in ways that affect the rest of the fediverse (Lemmygrad comes to mind) seems like something that would backfire, kind of like if I was queen of a territory but then joined the US as a state and then proceeded to send people to the three branches of government just to troll the system. But there are safeguards against that, just not on Lemmy.