• @rusticus
    link
    English
    63 months ago

    No it’s really really easily to implement taxation that’s not regressive.

    • Jojo
      link
      English
      53 months ago

      A progressive tax that means the biggest users pay the most would probably be ideal (but then that’s mostly true in every situation)

        • Jojo
          link
          English
          53 months ago

          Because it would affect rich folks more, so they spend some money now to convince lawmakers not to charge them more later.

    • @Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      How comes I never saw that implemented, then? Progressive taxation stops “progressing” at around the 100k threshold and that’s basically just a decent salary. The Rich are never really affected by it.

      Carbon credits would be a way to level the ground in some situations and could give you a right to say NO to people consuming more than their share, or at least account for externalities and get paid if you allow them to use your “quota”.