• Wanderer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Same as women voting or 16 years old or people without land.

    People vote on who gets to vote

    • 0ops
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah sure, until civil war breaks out decades later over the huge portion of the population that couldn’t vote because it was democratically decided that they were the wrong skin color. It’s not like this is some untested idea.

      • Wanderer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Okay you’re right. An elite few should hold the power on who gets to vote and who doesn’t.

        • 0ops
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          What is the original voting block hoarding their voting rights (eg white male land owners) if not an elite few?

          Look, obviously infants can’t vote, so you have a point that technically there needs to be a democratic way to decide who can and can’t vote based on maturity/age at least, but there’s no good argument for any further restrictions on adult residents subject to the law of their government. I don’t care if they’re not in military service, I don’t care if they’re bums on the street, I don’t care if they’re slaves, I don’t care if they’re serving life in prison - they’re citizens, they’re subject to the system, they deserve equal say in how the system works. Excessively legislating who can and can’t vote is just asking for “an elite few” to exploit it.

          • Wanderer
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            You could argue that people exploit the system when someone leaches off it when others do hard work.

            At least it someone had to serve the betterment of their country for a while they aren’t just leaching.

            • 0ops
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Like those hardworking slaves in the South! Wait they couldn’t vote, and a large chunk of the people who could vote (ironically leaching off the slaves hard work) had a vested interest in making sure it stayed that way. Do you see the problem?

              Power begats power, and even with good intentions concentrating it historically will strip minorities of their rights, even after they’re no longer minorities, ironically leading to minority rule. Gerrymandering is essentially this same problem of voters (indirectly through their representatives) deciding how votes are counted. Whoever is in power now will change voting rights in their favor to keep it, it’s naive to think otherwise.

              • Wanderer
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                I’m sorry who changed it so slaves could vote the majority of people or a minority of people?

                • 0ops
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Technically a majority … 80 fucking years after the country was established. In fact, it wasn’t even a true majority per se as former confederated states weren’t even allowed their congressional representation back until they agreed to adopt the 14th amendment. Citizenship for citizenship. There was never a come-to-Jesus moment, they were tugged by the ear into giving African-Americans citizenship after failing to secede ironically because they feared the threat of losing slavery as an institution. Practically speaking, “who changed it who so slaves could vote” was the majority, but not the majority of voters, it was the majority of bullets and bayonets. Turns out when people don’t get representation legally, they’ll figure out another way to make their voice heard, eventually.

                  • Wanderer
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    What you are saying exactly here is the majority of men and women only in the North got to decide the future for everyone in the south unless they signed up for something they didn’t want to sign up for. Is that right?

                    That’s sounds more democratic than a system where the majority of the adult population do something to contribute to the imporvement of their country and planet, then they get to vote.