President Biden expressed the US’s ‘ironclad commitment to NATO’

  • Xeelee@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And those fuckers have the gall to call themselves patriots. If anything, she’s s Russian patriot.

  • Ascyron@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Those who dont learn from history are doomed to repeat it - and this crazy lady seems doomed to repeat it.

    If there’s a budget problem and you’re spending more than your fair share, negotiate on the budget, don’t throw your toys out of the cot and have a temper tantrum and try to leave the most stable military alliance on earth that’s the only thing holding Russia and china in check.

    (Not an American, not from a NATO country, and not a supporter of Biden in any way, just saying that NATO is a bloody good idea and I’m glad it exists since it seems like the only thing stopping Putin from starting WW3).

  • DragonAce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can we not give this moron free air time? This idiot, like Trump, just wants to remain in the limelight and bask in adoration. She doesn’t give a damned about NATO or any other foreign policy, she just likes seeing herself on the news.

  • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maddening.

    Not only is her rationale for scuttling NATO wrong (she argues that US defense spending ‘goes to NATO’, that’s not how that works), the consequence of a US pullout of NATO would be disastrously bad for US and NATO interests

    It’s as if her amendment isn’t seriously intended to become law so much as it’s an opportunity to spout bullshit that people will believe

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Her entire “career” is based on attention-getting alone- she’s never helped anything. That doesn’t benefit her.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the entire GOP. Their idea of improving things is just a list of people to hate and reasons why rich people should pay less taxes. I’m consistently amazed at how many of these assholes show up without even pretending to have a plan forward and still get votes.

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    So? Who cares what that pig cunt wants to do? She’s irrelevant.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considering she’s on multiple committees and was instrumental in putting McCarthy into place, I wouldn’t call her irrelevant.

      That said, this particular bill will go nowhere.

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          She should be irrelevant but unfortunaltey she’s a member of congress and has more power that 99.999% of people.

        • rambaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yet you’re here talking about her. She’s an actual traitor in a position of power. But sure she’s irrelevant.

          • Rhoeri@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            So, please…. Explain to me what makes her relevant. And remember- relevant ≠ popular.

            The floor is yours.

            • rambaroo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Popularity is relevance in a democracy. She has influence over millions of people. She’s an elected federal official who sits on a bunch of committees in Congress. Her shitty opinions on things like the debt ceiling helped bring us to the brink of a financial crisis. How is that not relevant?

              • Rhoeri@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                So I’m not allowed d to have the opinion that’s she’s irrelevant? She HAS to be relevant to me?

                Cool.

                Hey, if you don’t mind, I’m going to check with you from now on when it comes to these things since you speak directly for me on these matters.

                • Fushuan [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So much hate… They are saying that she is relevant, you are saying that she isn’t without providing any proof then shielding your statement as an opinion after posting it.

                  Come on

              • Rhoeri@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                So I’m not allowed d to have the opinion that’s she’s irrelevant? She HAS to be relevant to me?

                Cool.

                Hey, if you don’t mind, I’m going to check with you from now on when it comes to these things since you speak directly for me on these matters.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Hey man what you’re missing is that “relevancy” for elected leaders is objective. Her votes and committee positions do, in fact, objectively matter regardless of how much you or I personally disregard her.

                  You’re having an argument based around a misnterpretation of that concept

          • Rhoeri@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because shes a fucking idiot with zero experience in her field and offers nothing to the forward progress of her country. In fact, her behavior is mostly anti-American.

            At worst, she’s a traitor to her country- at best…. She’s irrelevant.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Being an idiot and a traitor does not make someone irrelevant. Do you not know what irrelevant means? No one with real power is irrelevant because they can wield that power in a relevant way.

              • Rhoeri@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                1 year ago

                Do you know what irrelevant means? Because you’re arguing her popularity. I’m saying she irrelevant.

                She is an irrelevant human being. I’m not going to argue this.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, I know what irrelevant means:

                  “not connected with or relevant to something.”

                  This has nothing to do with her popularity. This has to do with her power. She sits on committees. That is power. She can unseat McCarthy any time she pleases. That is power. Power makes you relevant. Always. You can be incredibly unpopular and still be relevant if you have power. See: lots of autocrats.

                • GrenadineBombardier@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It really sounds like you might not know what irrelevant means.

                  Saying she’s irrelevant implies nothing she does matters because it won’t have an effect on anyone. At the best, she shifts the Overton window, at worst she finds a way to get legislation through that strips the rights of millions of Americans.

                  To say she’s irrelevant means that everyone should be able to ignore her indefinitely with no consequences, and we’re saying that’s simply not the case.

                • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Lets you, me, and MTG go to D.C. and vote on legislation before Congress.

                  Who gets to vote?

                  Who is irrelevant there?

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This woman is uglier on the inside than the outside… And that’s saying something because she looks like a horse’s ass.