“OMG look what you made me do” is classic abuser/narcissistic bullshit.
Trying to make sense of general geopolitics and the interests of nation states through the lense of human psychology and interpersonal relationships is the most baby-brained lib shit possible.
Human behavior in groups is remarkably similar to other interpersonal interactions. I’m not embarrassed if something who agrees with this absurd post thinks something silly about me. Amazingly, political interactions are conducted by people.
This isn’t a strictly factual issue for which a citation can be provided. Also, it’s fairly clear that in this environment, any citation I provided would be shot down and questioned. That’s my personal interpretation of political behavior and you are obviously free to disagree.
This isn’t a strictly factual issue for which a citation can be provided.
So basically “It came to me in a dream.”
Also, it’s fairly clear that in this environment, any citation I provided would be shot down
More likely that it’s a claim that is incredibly unlikely for you to be able to back up because it as an absurd and ridiculous thing to believe on its face, which is precisely why you are being asked to support your claim.
and questioned
Oh no, horror of all horrors! We wouldn’t want to risk discussion and dialog in a space explicitly intended for exactly those things!
If you just want to say some bullshit and have it pass without comment, you can accomplish that by shouting into the void. There’s no reason to post publicly if that’s all you want to do.
I responded to your claim pretty clearly when I said
it’s a claim that is incredibly unlikely for you to be able to back up because it as an absurd and ridiculous thing to believe on its face, which is precisely why you are being asked to support your claim.
Just because you don’t agree with my characterization of your claim doesn’t mean I didn’t respond to it.
Trying to make sense of general geopolitics and the interests of nation states through the lense of human psychology and interpersonal relationships is the most baby-brained lib shit possible.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
Human behavior in groups is remarkably similar to other interpersonal interactions. I’m not embarrassed if something who agrees with this absurd post thinks something silly about me. Amazingly, political interactions are conducted by people.
Citation strongly needed that governments act with the psychology of an individual human.
This isn’t a strictly factual issue for which a citation can be provided. Also, it’s fairly clear that in this environment, any citation I provided would be shot down and questioned. That’s my personal interpretation of political behavior and you are obviously free to disagree.
Could we get this added to the top bar? I feel like it’s in theme with the other quotes up there.
Yes, of course. Rather than respond reasonably, threaten to mock me on some sort of circlejerk.
So basically “It came to me in a dream.”
More likely that it’s a claim that is incredibly unlikely for you to be able to back up because it as an absurd and ridiculous thing to believe on its face, which is precisely why you are being asked to support your claim.
Oh no, horror of all horrors! We wouldn’t want to risk discussion and dialog in a space explicitly intended for exactly those things!
If you just want to say some bullshit and have it pass without comment, you can accomplish that by shouting into the void. There’s no reason to post publicly if that’s all you want to do.
But you didn’t actually respond to anything I asserted, so…
I responded to your claim pretty clearly when I said
Just because you don’t agree with my characterization of your claim doesn’t mean I didn’t respond to it.
Alright, good luck with that lmao
yes, comments with “lmao” are often very well reasoned and thought provoking. Thanks.
yes, of course, someone else’s graphic! that was very well thought out and persuasive.