• LufyCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Couldn’t agree more.

    It’s great you can do it and you’re free to, but not using javascript often means revamping the whole codebase and making everything 5x more complicated.

    Which just won’t happen to make 6 users happy

    • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Amen. We do provide text versions though, but a few JS-blocking users have complained about having a barebones experience.

      • DarkenLM@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        but a few JS-blocking users have complained about having a barebones experience.

        Well no shit, have they ever wondered why the language was created in the first place?