Every liberal, they are reborn anew each day with no memories whatsoever of the past

  • gonk [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sorry if what I’m about to say is completely wrong, but I disagree with calling Fox News liberal. I don’t think words have absolutely constant meanings, their definitions can change if people start using them in a different way. That has happened with the words “liberal” and “conservative” where they are used to refer to a different set of political positions than 200 years ago (mostly because people advocating for feudalism and aristocratic rule are few and far between nowadays). So I think that Fox News would be “liberal” in the original meaning of the word, but not in the current understanding of the word.

    • Although you have a point about words not having absolute meanings, the usage of liberal the poster everyone is dunking on is pretty much only used in the us and Canada. Most of the rest of the world uses liberal in the original sense of the word (see the liberal party in Australia for example)

    • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I probably wouldn’t describe Fox News as liberal myself. Obviously they are liberals, but in context it makes more sense to refer to the channel as conservative.

      My gripe is just with libs being politically illiterate, while claiming we don’t know what words mean

    • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem, as others have pointed out, is that only in America is the term “liberal” twisted to mean just one part of the liberal spectrum. Words aren’t unchangeable, but if just one place on the entire planet is using the term “liberal” that way - in a way that obfuscates real political understanding - it should be pushed back against.