I’ve run across these terms several times, but without enough context to figure out what they mean. Could someone help me out, please?

ETA All of you are amazing! A huge thank you to everyone who responded, and an extra thank you to those who have provided links or explanations to further and/or related information. I am learning so much by reading all of these comments!

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can there be such a thing as a progressive/leftist who is pro-authoritarianism?

    Not really.

    Progressivness is about freedom, authoritarianism about the lack of freedom.

    But someone could hypothetically be an actual communist and an authoritarian. Because communism is just an economic system.

    In practice the only way it would work is “mob rule”. Like what happened during the French revolution where people rose up, killed the ruling class, and then distributed their wealth.

    But even that wasn’t the same because the mob didn’t attempt to distribute it equally. Everyone just grabbed shit.

    I think it’s especially confusing to people with a two party political system, because economic and social policy start to get intertwined, when they’re two different things.

    Which a cynic would say is intentional so that no matter who gets elected, the wealthy win.

    • IchNichtenLichten@server1.duluth.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A cynic or a realist? All political systems have to have some checks against human greed and avarice or things quickly turn to shit for the average person. If you can’t vote someone out, that’s an important check you’re giving up.