There’s a bunch of closed source ones, the best of which were brought by Adobe, but there’s never really been a big open source effort.

GIMP say that the lack of separation between functionality and UI is why they’re not behind an effort. That said they said they’d be happy to stick their name on an effort.

But this takes me back to my original question, why are there no open source photo editors, despite their popularity?

  • JoYo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    i dont think gimp should stick their name on their own product.

    • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      On the flip side, I grew up most of my life only knowing gimp could stand for gnu image manipulation program, and is still the first place my mind goes to when I hear the word