If you’re following grammar rules, which I already said it isn’t. Also, it would have an apostrophe if it was possessive, so by itself baguette’s isn’t necessarily wrong (for example, the baguette’s wrapper was clear). I’m confused about what you’re arguing since it seems to make no sense.
The difference between GrammEr and grammAr is a typo. Also, I’m not the one who changed the topic, you did by only responding by commenting about my typo.
“Typo” is short for “typographical error.” The A and E aren’t close enough to excuse what’s obviously a common spelling error. You don’t have to lie on the Internet.
My reply was not solely about your spelling error. Your reading comprehension sucks.
You say things, but I’m not sure if you know what they mean. It was in fact a misspelling since I do know the correct spelling. Additionally, typos can occur in more than just one way, so it is still a typo. There is nothing saying a typo HAS to be because the keys are next to each other.
Also how is this comment not only about grammar:
*grammar
It wouldn’t make any sense for it to be possessive.
I am not lying on the internet, nor do I feel the need to. I care about the opinions of people I know and care about, not one from a random stranger who ignores facts.
Obviously I was referring to the possessive form of baguette. Do you think somehow “grammer” would be the possessive of “grammar?” If so, your grammar is even worse than I thought. Stay in school, kid.
What are you even saying here? You’re saying words but they just don’t make sense, especially in the context of what I’m talking about. Above I was saying it was a typo that I made and asking how is a comment that is only correcting a grammar mistake “not solely about your spelling error”. Why do you think that I would think “grammer” is the possessive of “grammar”? I literally just said it was a typo…
If you’re following grammar rules, which I already said it isn’t. Also, it would have an apostrophe if it was possessive, so by itself baguette’s isn’t necessarily wrong (for example, the baguette’s wrapper was clear). I’m confused about what you’re arguing since it seems to make no sense.
*grammar
It wouldn’t make any sense for it to be possessive.
Oh no a typo from me typing on my phone. Guess my entire argument is invalid. That must be why you didn’t address any of my points.
That’s clearly not a typo.
Good job changing the subject.
The difference between GrammEr and grammAr is a typo. Also, I’m not the one who changed the topic, you did by only responding by commenting about my typo.
“Typo” is short for “typographical error.” The A and E aren’t close enough to excuse what’s obviously a common spelling error. You don’t have to lie on the Internet.
My reply was not solely about your spelling error. Your reading comprehension sucks.
You say things, but I’m not sure if you know what they mean. It was in fact a misspelling since I do know the correct spelling. Additionally, typos can occur in more than just one way, so it is still a typo. There is nothing saying a typo HAS to be because the keys are next to each other.
Also how is this comment not only about grammar:
I am not lying on the internet, nor do I feel the need to. I care about the opinions of people I know and care about, not one from a random stranger who ignores facts.
Obviously I was referring to the possessive form of baguette. Do you think somehow “grammer” would be the possessive of “grammar?” If so, your grammar is even worse than I thought. Stay in school, kid.
What are you even saying here? You’re saying words but they just don’t make sense, especially in the context of what I’m talking about. Above I was saying it was a typo that I made and asking how is a comment that is only correcting a grammar mistake “not solely about your spelling error”. Why do you think that I would think “grammer” is the possessive of “grammar”? I literally just said it was a typo…
You also still are ignoring what I’m saying.