Ingredient-wise, they have the same, except the honey nut has extra crap in it… why is it always cheaper? We’re talking a 30% difference per 100g!

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    This would make the most sense, until you look at sales and revenue.

    Plain cheerios is still the company’s best selling cereal (the best selling of all cereal ever), followed by honey nut. Outsell honey nut by 10 million boxes and having positive higher year-over-year sales (vs shrinking sales for honey nut). SOURCE

    Despite selling 10 million more boxes, original cheerios makes the company $14 dollars more, so they have a higher profit margin.

    The mystery continues, or perhaps I just solved it. General Mills doesn’t have to sell plain cheerios for less, because there’s no profit incentive to do so. 🤑

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Perhaps just corporate greed then. They know they can charge more and people will still buy it, so they do. Actually they could probably charge even more per box and make more money, and even if demand drops a little because of it that won’t matter much because they won’t have to produce and ship as much, saving more money.

      • LemmyZed@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Price elasticity Look it up.

        They’re charging more for the plain product just because they can. Next door’s competitor can make a better product, at a lower price, and people still won’t switch.