Asking someone else to graph data for you to analyze is a disrespectful misunderstanding of how data analysis work.
The person graphing is doing the data analysis. They have to, at some level, to make the data presentable. If you are incapable of doing that, and your contribution is to be fully reliant on what they graph so you can look at what they make and go “huh yeah line does go up” you aren’t useful. They can tweak the data to say many things, and you wouldn’t understand it happened.
Maybe it depends on the domain, but I think it is perfectly reasonable both to ask or produce graphs to show data trends, qualitative behavior, relative rates, etc. I mean, looking at one chart and acting like you know better than the analyst might be a duck move but wanting the chart isn’t.
Imagine if scientific papers didn’t use plots to visualize data?
You can definitely analyze a graph/chart, but unless you need help understanding a more complex representation, there’s not much you can argue with. Even if you know of a bias in it, they can just make up something about avoiding another bias or increasing focus on an area
Some of these are hitting a little hard for me lately…
deleted by creator
