fettuccinecode@programming.dev to Rust@programming.dev · 9 months agoAnalyzing Data 180,000x Faster with Rustwillcrichton.netexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up162arrow-down17cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.partyhackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up155arrow-down1external-linkAnalyzing Data 180,000x Faster with Rustwillcrichton.netfettuccinecode@programming.dev to Rust@programming.dev · 9 months agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.partyhackernews@derp.foo
minus-squarebluGill@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·9 months agoWith rust is the joke as if you couldn’t do it otherwise. Maybe c would be only 179,999x faster, or FORTRAN 180,001x, (numbers made up). Python could probably be made 60,000x faster as well.
With rust is the joke as if you couldn’t do it otherwise. Maybe c would be only 179,999x faster, or FORTRAN 180,001x, (numbers made up). Python could probably be made 60,000x faster as well.