• AssPennies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The difference is huge, and not hard to understand.

    Apparently it is, for you.

    The federal agency is called USDA, and it’s the one that runs the P-EBT program. The service is there, ready to dole out the cash, they just need the info to best disburse the funds. The onus is on MO to work with the federal gov to communicate information about its own citizens to those services.

    There’s about zero chance in hell that red states are going to allow the feds to roll in to town and pull school district information that it would need to disburse the funds. The states already have those records, and they best know how to aggregate them. They just need to <gulp> swallow their hangups about gov bureaucracy and actual spend some tax money to serve their citizens.

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Again, the federal agency makes the program available but doesn’t actually build the infrastructure required for the states to use it. This very article we’re commenting on points that out a number of times.

      You can shout “Republicans hate kids!” as much as you want, but aren’t republicans the ones encouraging people to have more kids and less abortions? How does that logic work?