• gon [he]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    If it’s worth doing at all, it’s worth doing a little bit.

    I believe you’re referring to iPhone’s clean energy charging feature. Here’s my question: if you can use clean energy, why wouldn’t you? It might make very little difference to the environment, but a little difference is still a difference.

    Still, using ad-blockers is really not like that iPhone feature:

    1. That feature relies on the grid itself, meaning it’s useless for a lot of people that have basically no clean energy where they live, while ad-blockers can be useful to anyone using the internet.
    2. It may be to the user’s detriment, while ad-blockers improve user experience.
    3. It’s device dependent, whereas ad-blockers are available to virtually everyone, not just iPhone users.
    4. Ad-blockers can be combined with clean energy charging.

    The impact ad-blockers can have on the environment is similar to iPhone’s clean energy charging in the same way a healthy diet is similar to eating a carrot. Yes, on the surface level they do just reduce your consumption of fossil fuel-generated energy, but ad-blockers reduce your energy consumption overall, not just trade it for green energy (that still requires tons of fossil fuels to be burned).

    Much love,
    gon

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      if you can use clean energy, why wouldn’t you?

      Because, in this case, it can be incredibly inconvenient. It’s just another bullshit marketing ploy from Apple.

      I don’t understand the rest of your comment.

      Should you use ad blockers? Yes, absolutely. Is “saving the environment” a legitimate reason? I would argue no.

      Sincerely,

      xoxo helenslunch