• vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    They better!

    Deterrence doesn’t work if your adversary doesn’t know how launch in time.

    • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well, Russia is a dead empire, a failed state anyway. There would be very little benefit for the US in nuking them at this point.

      The real deterrence for USA is probably China – if not already, then at least very soon.

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is no benefit for anyone nuking anyone. Nukes are a negative sum game. Use them and everybody loses.

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        As long as they maintain thousands of mated warheads and the related delivery systems, deterrence is relevant.

        The fact that they are fucking themselves up in other ways makes it more relevant, not less.