• DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Funny, I can point to at least 50 Democratic and capitalist countries that run just fine and are in the top 10 best countries to live in on the earth. But you can’t name just one viable country run by a communist government?

    Funny how that works 😂🤔

    • Val
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I said before the French revolution.

      Also I doubt they are going to be “the best” after climate change (which is caused by those countries) causes them to collapse.

      • DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why is it so hard to name one successful, current communist country?

        Forget about your French revolution nonsense 😂

        • Val
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Because human progress is about making things that do not exist. Saying that something doesn’t exist currently does not mean it cannot exist.

          Before the french revolution there were no democratic countries. back then you could say “Name one democratic country. Oh you can’t? Guess democracy doesn’t work.” and it would be just as valid as your claim now.

          • DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Fair point but communism hasn’t been effectively implemented because it’s being purposely stifled, it’s because it’s a crap system.

            I guess if you take the best aspects of communism and ignore the history of how shitty it is then maybe you can theoretically imagine a successful version of it. But I don’t need to hypothesize such a scenario. There’s plenty of data and historical facts that completely prove my point

            • Val
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Humanity has progressed a lot in even the last 20 years. Using historical facts to prove something doesn’t work is not effective under these circumstances.

              Also communism (in the classical sense) doesn’t really have a practical history, as no country on the planet has purposefully reached it.

              The soviet union or china were never communist. They were both horrific state capitalist dictatorships.

              And capitalism is also crap. For example look at the impending climate catastrophe.

              • DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                I’ll never say capitalism is perfect but it’s a system that works - and at its best, it works remarkably well. I hear this argument a lot that communism hasn’t implemented the way it should be. Has there ever been a government that came close to what you would consider “almost good enough” communism?

                • Val
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Communism is by definition a stateless, moneyless, classless society. If any of these exist it is not communism. There is no “almost good enough”. You can’t have almost classless. If you have classes you aren’t classless, and in a single party system the party members are a class.

                  I put it to you that capitalism doesn’t work. It is an inherently corrupt system that will inevitably end in the destruction of everything. Capitalism is unsustainable. Built on the myth of perpetual growth and willing to kill everything on this planet to achieve that. Given a long enough time-frame all wealth and decision making capabilities under a capitalism will be consolidated in the hands of a couple of rich companies that will only care about economic growth. Damn the consequences.

                  /sidenote. I am not actually a communist but an Anarchist. I oppose all unjust hierarchies. Money, state and class just happen to all fit under this definition and because of that I also support communism.

                  • DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Most economic systems are inherently morally neutral. They’re just tools with no sentience - so I don’t understand how you can say capitalism is inherently corrupt when you literally said communism hasn’t been implemented properly in any country or state. It seems to me like communism is more flawed if it can be exploited more easily.

                    Please don’t say you’re an anarchist or I’ll have even less respect for you. 😂

                    Seriously, though, I used to be a pretty radical socialist until I did some real research (not trying to insult you, I mean that I looked at my beliefs through a very critical lens and my ideologies didn’t stand up to real scrutiny) and soul searching to end up leaning closer to what you would call a soc-dem.

                    I genuinely believe that you communists and anarchists want better living standards for every human on earth. But I think you guys have been lied to about the evils of capitalism and how good the system can truly be. And I concede that the extreme disparities between the rich and poor in a capitalist system are pretty fucking gross.