• Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Extremely misleading. At that time these separatists were still Ukrainians engaged in the start of the civil war.

        • Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          A trial that took place with nobody representing any defence after the new war started by a non-neutral nation is not reliable. It’s frustrating that it was held at all because it’s made the entire issue so muddy that it will likely be decades before reliable truth is found when governments start releasing classified information in limited hangouts.

            • picard@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              You either have not spent any time reading through the evidence, or are willfully distorting the truth.

              Considering their entire argument was to assert with zero evidence it was Ukrainians who did it, then to claim all the evidence showing otherwise is unreliable and we’ll never know the truth, I think we can probably answer with a reasonable degree of confidence they are purposefully seeking to mislead.

      • ieatpillowtags
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Separatists with Russian military equipment? Everyone knows about the little green men bro, the whole world is watching.