• Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    This, they’ve basically been running on “not trump”, sorry that’s not good enough for me.

    • III@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Your alternative is Trump. There isn’t a third option at this point. So if not Trump isn’t good enough for you…then actual Trump is? Your logic is bad, you should feel bad.

      • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Granted, out of two options, not trump is better, but it’s still not good enough. If the choice was to have no food, or to have some food but still not enough.

        I would still choose to have some food over no food but saying my logic is bad for saying that the options available still aren’t good enough isnt particularly helpful. We can demand better while still not choosing the worst option.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        There are alternatives, we had Bernie running twice, Marianne Williamson, Cornell West, Howie Hawkins, etc… but the Democratic party actively works against them.

      • atyaz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        “Your options in this country are someone actively enabling a genocide, or a pseudo-fascist” -> that country can burn in hell for all I care