• Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Didn’t argue that it requires more for a car hence why Registration is a lot more. If it was taxes in general and only for bikes it would not be built for cars to use either. You have to share it. Just like you expect them to share with bikes.

    And speaking of taxes : Just like you expect transit such as buses to also exist for people moving. Which is also paid by taxes and bikes should also have to share with them. if you put a bus or any emergency vehicle in place of that car in that cartoon, those cyclists are the bigger asshole in the equation.

    I’m all for cutting down emissions but putting people in danger or doubling down inconsideration is a foolish, abusive and negligent stance to be taking.

    • yA3xAKQMbq
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Go shift your goalposts somewhere else. You said cyclists didn’t pay for roads. You’re wrong. Now leave, thx.

    • RedTie13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except pedestrians and cyclists subsidize the roads through taxes while cars wouldn’t even break even with high cost of road maintenance. This is not including the insane parking requirements that most US cities have.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cars pay a sliding registration though so that’s simply not true.

        Also: Share with the busses.

        • RedTie13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          A sliding scale that still isn’t enough to fund the roads does not make it any less true lol