And for that matter, could our universe be inside a black hole?
  • BrooklynMan@lemmy.mlEnglish
    8·
    1 year ago

    tl:dr: possibly, but if so, it would be the size of the entire universe and, as a result, impossible for us to determine one way to the other.

    • ragica@lemmy.mlOPEnglish
      0·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for the interesting link. Can’t argue with Sean Carroll. Except of course for the people who do argue with Sean Carroll. Ha ha. But that’s way above my pay grade. But some do argue, even in the comments on that linked blog post. Sean’s responses there are of course also excellent and worth reading.

      • i_love_FFT@lemmy.mlEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        Yeah! I think this kind of question will end up being a question of definition for future generation of cosmologists…

        With the current definition, it seems the universe is not a black hole, but shares a lot of characteristics with them (except its singularity is in the past, but the future). If enough scientists like the idea of the universe being a black hole, they could simply modify the definition to allow “time-reversed black holes” as well, which seems to include the universe (if I understand correctly… My GR courses a far I’m my memory!)

  • Gsus4@lemmy.oneEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    I didn’t find any ArXiv links in the page, but the main point is this: given how flat the Universe is, if it is inside a black hole, it needs to be really large in order to keep the curvature inside so flat.