• LesbianLiberty [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand, Zizek has good and bad information that can be easily taken from his analysis like taking the wheat from the chaff, but patsoc? What does that even mean in this context? I know what patsoc means, but how has that come forward in any of their creations or their perspectives? As far as I can tell as an enjoyer of their media (all three, not even sure if you mean Yugopnik or Second Thought) I’ve not encountered any sense of anyone having a PatSoc perspective.

      • LesbianLiberty [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For all the criticisms of the CPUSA, of which I have many, I don’t think ascribing him the entirety of it’s failings is quite fair; especially when considering that he is simply a contributor to and not a member of the CPUSA as far as I’m aware. I think you’re putting the horse before the carriage, he’s simply a ML, Jackson Hinkle and Infrahaz are examples of explicit "Patsoc"s and the gap between them and Second Thought is comically wide. If the charge is simply that he’s contributed to CPUSA, then, okay? I don’t think that’s the same as being able to accurately label him as under the same banner as these kinds of ramblings below

        PatSocs are bad because they adopt ML ideas and twist them into allowing racism, sexism, and queerphobia to run amock in their communities. They don’t build anything and instead create cults with leaders like Lyndon LaRouche; as much as I disagree with CPUSA’s direction and completely ineffectual leadership, I think considering JT due to his proximity to be on a similar level to Lyndon LaRouche is a wild overcorrection.

        Additionally, I should note that when I was a member of CPUSA everyone was very clear that all the LaRouchites, Haz fans, and Borgar King Caleb Maupin appreciators had no place in that space. I think you should criticize CPUSA in order to find the correct line, but I think you may not be using a common definition for Patsoc when it includes CPUSA

        • pillow [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m in favor of expanding “patsoc” to really any american socialist who tries to latch on to ambient americanism instead of toeing the hard amerikkka line of dismantling the project, renouncing its legacy, redistributing the piles of imperialist loot, and retreating into the background

          e.g. from former cpusa chair sam webb

          A big challenge for sure, and crucial to winning the American people to engage in such a[n anti-imperialist] movement, is re-envisioning our role in the world community. The point isn’t for the U.S. government to simply to crawl into a national shell, but to reinsert itself into world affairs on the basis of cooperation, peace, equality, and mutual benefits.

          or current co-chair joe sims

          In reading “No Room for Patriotism,” it’s as if Eugene Debs never went to jail to protest the First World War, the communists never risked life and limb to organize the mass productions industries while helping free the Scottsboro defendants and sending thousands to fight Franco in Spain. Did not our grandmothers and grandfathers fight the good fight in WW 2, keep the red flame alive in the heat of the Cold War while marching to desegregate swimming pools and restaurants and bathrooms before it became popular? Were we not on the front lines in demanding an end to the Vietnam War, the embargo of Cuba and freedom for Mandela?

          And what about the hundreds of millions of other plain ordinary folk who comprise the vast majority of our class and people: Christian and Jewish, Muslim and Buddhist, citizen and immigrant, gay and straight, workers, professionals, black, white, brown, Asian and Native American – simple decent minded individuals who strived to “do the right thing” as they understood it by upholding democracy and fighting war and repression?

          Do they count for nothing?

          • LesbianLiberty [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Eugh, Sam Webb, what a dickhead. Yeah, no, I don’t know if patsoc would be the correct term or be translateable to other people as it’s already got a pretty set definition, but there is no room for “American” patriotism. It’s weird, frankly, maybe I’m abnormal but the US just makes me feel icky now. I don’t know what comes after but I hope it’s not the United States.

            • pillow [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              sam “she will fight for the full range of democratic rights – collective bargaining rights, wage rights, job rights, women’s rights, civil rights, gay rights, voting rights, immigrant rights, and, not least, health rights” webb

              not-hillary