All of the site’s employees have been fired. What the owners, G/O Media, do with the site is another matter. Obviously it is still online for whatever reason.
And not liking the style of journalism that Jezebel did is fine, but I am not really particularly inclined to debate the seriousness of such statements, because if people start nitpicking about how the President is not a member of the Senate, while the article is nowhere implying that he is, then it’s pointless to debate at all.
I quoted the article’s line that only makes rational sense if the President is a member of the Senate. Whether you choose literacy or illiteracy is entirely up to you.
Just because you play dumb by ignoring the relation between the President of the United States and the politics of his party does not make your statements any more coherent. Not that I am surprised that this is above someone who doesn’t understand the difference between a website being online and being actively maintained by a staff.
All of the site’s employees have been fired. What the owners, G/O Media, do with the site is another matter. Obviously it is still online for whatever reason.
And not liking the style of journalism that Jezebel did is fine, but I am not really particularly inclined to debate the seriousness of such statements, because if people start nitpicking about how the President is not a member of the Senate, while the article is nowhere implying that he is, then it’s pointless to debate at all.
I quoted the article’s line that only makes rational sense if the President is a member of the Senate. Whether you choose literacy or illiteracy is entirely up to you.
Just because you play dumb by ignoring the relation between the President of the United States and the politics of his party does not make your statements any more coherent. Not that I am surprised that this is above someone who doesn’t understand the difference between a website being online and being actively maintained by a staff.