• MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Like I said, at the time I didn’t even know what open source meant and assumed that Linux is a product, and Ubuntu was the company that made it. I know better now, but back then I just saw it as a “replace Windows without spending money”. Also I was a teenager, and I would have pirated anything back then without a second thought even if it weren’t free.

    Also, since Linux is so widely used by corporations, they fund its development, so I prefer to donate the small amounts of money I can to smaller projects.

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Linux ≠ Linux Desktop

      This is a huge problem in the community and the decentralized nature. Like, I dont even know what projects I all use, like curl, ffmpeg, bubblewrap, flatpak, systemd, all these things and again, these are well known projects.

      This is a huge funding problem as only GUI apps can ask for funding. Corporations often dont fund small projects, but often just the kernel and Core apps.

      Not shaming teenage you of course :D

      • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Linux ≠ Linux Desktop

        I’m aware, I was just explaining my experience back in 2007. It was like moving to a new country where things work differently and the attitude needed was very different from what I am used to.