• Lojcs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    It doesn’t help that all the humans have beauty filters on

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Human male 40 absolutely does not have a filter, that’s probably why he rated as the most human looking human.

    • FishFace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not only that but several of them are a bit weird looking (sorry to those people…) as in, 37 and 47 have obvious asymmetries, 31 is a bit bug-eyed, 18 seems to have been taken with a super telephoto lens or have a really flat face.

    • gullible@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This reminds me of an argument I saw here last week about AI and its use as a grammar checker. You can definitely do it, but you’re going to have all the markers of using AI to cheat.

      • wischi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not really, if you write the text first and only apply minor changes to fix the grammer (and not rewrite entire sentences) no AI detector will detect that because the sentence structure and pattern wouldn’t match typical AI output.

        • gullible@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Be sure to remember that, at best, AI takes prompts as interpretable guidelines and a request of “grammar checking” can involve some additional, unwarranted, restructuring. Points to whoever notices both AIisms that I noticed that chatgpt added to my grammar checked critique on grammar checking.