The U.K. paper confirmed it had removed the letter because of its sudden surge in popularity on TikTok and other social media sites.

  • samokosik@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
    3·
    8 months ago

    What I meant is censorship in terms of opinions on topics. We should be presented with both sides imo

    I should have written it in a clearer manner

    • 0xD@infosec.pubEnglish
      2·
      8 months ago

      There is no “both sides”, there is an infinite amount of opinions and perspectives on one thing: reality. Not all of those opinions are worth engaging with or deserve a platform.

      Though in this case with the letter it’s historically significant and I find their reasoning kind of pathetic, so I agree with you here.