Ridley Scott has been typically dismissive of critics taking issue with his forthcoming movie Napoleon, particularly French ones.

While his big-screen epic, starring Joaquin Phoenix as the embattled French emperor with Vanessa Kirby as his wife Josephine, has earned the veteran director plaudits in the UK, French critics have been less gushing, with Le Figaro saying the film could have been called “Barbie and Ken under the Empire,” French GQ calling the film “deeply clumsy, unnatural and unintentionally clumsy” and Le Point magazine quoting biographer Patrice Gueniffey calling the film “very anti-French and pro-British.”

Asked by the BBC to respond, Scott replied with customary swagger:

“The French don’t even like themselves. The audience that I showed it to in Paris, they loved it.”

The film’s world premiere took place in the French capital this week.

Scott added he would say to historians questioning the accuracy of his storytelling:

“Were you there? Oh you weren’t there. Then how do you know?”

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 year ago

    Scott added he would say to historians questioning the accuracy of his storytelling:

    "Were you there? Oh you weren’t there. Then how do you know?”

    😂 That response sounds like moron creationists when you explain evolution to them.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sounds like, literally is. That was the crux of Ken Ham’s argument when he debated Bill Nye. I’m not sure why he doesn’t apply it to his own Bible.

    • Ech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Big “do your own research!” energy.