RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 11 months agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1419arrow-down111cross-posted to: socialism@lemmy.mlglobalnews@lemmy.zipnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldfinance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.mlenvironment@beehaw.org
arrow-up1408arrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comRandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 11 months agomessage-square45fedilinkcross-posted to: socialism@lemmy.mlglobalnews@lemmy.zipnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldfinance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.mlenvironment@beehaw.org
minus-squareDizzy Devil DuckylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoLess kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoSo kids have négative value?
minus-squareDizzy Devil DuckylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agoDepending on who you ask, yes.
Less kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
So kids have négative value?
Depending on who you ask, yes.