• vmaziman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    While self driving cars seem like a good way for enterprise to bypass the cost of paying a driver, the driver’s other function isn’t just to drive the car, but to be liable for its operation.

    I wonder if it’s gonna take an insurance company to push for driverless before we see any driverless cars for sale. And if insurance companies don’t want to be liable then we may never see them.

    • Delta_V@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The insurance companies will go for it if the data shows driverless cars cause fewer accidents and lower claims versus human drivers, but it seems like that data will be a long time coming because right now the court of public opinion goes nuts when a driverless car hits someone while ignoring all the times that a human does the same. It makes no sense, and I hope the insurance companies can make it make sense soon.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They can always put some money to back it up, if the statistics really tell them so. I guess we’ll see it when it happens.