• Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    But nobody lived there except some gauchos and soldiers (many of whom were British)

    I mean, that’s blatantly not true.

    From the wiki article

    France was the first country to establish a permanent settlement in the Falkland Islands, with the foundation of Port-Saint-Louis on East Falkland by French explorer Louis Antoine de Bougainville in 1764.[2] The French colony consisted of a small fort and some settlements with a population of around 250.

    A pop of 250 is not “some gauchos and soldiers”. They were not even “(many of whom were British)”.

    I mean, we can go down the rabbit hole and start a population census conversation based on year-to-year, but that seems excessive for the conversation being had, and something that is really not needed.

    Its fair to say that the French had a presence there, they gave that presence to Spain, and Argentina inherited that presence from Spain (going around the long way, as the Doctor would say).

    • KevonLooney
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The gauchos are the settlers you mentioned. The soldiers were mostly British mercenaries. Did you read the article?

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        A colony of 240 people are not a few people, and are not all comprised of just gauchos or British mercenaries, they were French there as well.

        I’m going to “bow out” of further replies. I’ve been at this for coming up on 24 hours now, and am tired of everyone wanting their “pound of flesh”, and have said pretty much everything I can say. No disrespect meant to you, just thing the conversation has reached a termination point. Take care.