Sam Altman, the recently fired (and rehired) chief executive of Open AI, was asked earlier this year by his fellow tech billionaire Patrick Collison what he thought of the risks of synthetic biology. ‘I would like to not have another synthetic pathogen cause a global pandemic. I think we can all agree that wasn’t a great experience,’ he replied. ‘Wasn’t that bad compared to what it could have been, but I’m surprised there has not been more global coordination and I think we should have more of that.’

  • zogwarg@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    One (simpler) explanation is that proving an absence of something is almost impossible, and that attempting too hard would make them look a heck of a lot guilty.

    There is a good reason why the burden of evidence is “innocent until proven guilty”, and yes this extends to the (in your eyes) untrustworthy.

    Prove to me you never stole candy from a store as a child (or if you did, replace that accusation with any item of higher value until you hit something you did not steal)

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      There is also the whole ‘why would we have to prove anything? We are fucking China!’ stance all big hegemonic countries have.

      • Shitgenstein1@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s not just big hegemonic countries in general but specifically the particularly image-obsessed character of geopolitics in East Asia. Mianzi is a real concern in Chinese diplomacy.