Kyle Pitts has been a topic of discussion this season mainly for his lack of significant production compared to his draft overall, his rookie season, other TE’s in general, etc. So my question to you guys is what do you think Pitts will end up being on the Falcons: do you think he’s falling short due to Arthur’s Smith awful play calling and the generally terrible offense or could Pitts end up being a bust? Or do you think the truth is somewhere in the middle?
Alittle of both, I think being 4th overall was alittle high but he wasn’t falling out the top 15 for damn sure. That being said, Smith’s schemes and playcall and groupings might be bottom 5 in the league. TJ H. In Minnesota being a perfect example, he is schemed open alot, with no Jefferson and 3 different QBs this season. Can’t blame Ridder can’t blame not having enough weapons…the fact that London Pitts robinsob pattersonball are having their snaps limited because he wants so many rotations it downright ignorant on the highest of levels.
Just to dumb this down alittle
We have London who can be a poor man’s Larry Fitz We have Pitts who could be a poor man’s tony g or even tj h in Minnesota We have Robinson who can be barkely Patterson who can be a poor man’s barkley Allgier who runs like devonta freeman Smith who is a poor man’s Antonio gates
And you can’t pull film from these guys best games and scheme up playcalls to get them open why?..