why does the US still just routinely mutilate children? fuck john kellogg’s eugenicist corn flake ass

    • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      It’s primarily circumcised fathers who drive the cycle of abuse. To leave their son intact would be a tacit admission that they were robbed of something valuable, and that their parents did something horrific to them. This puts up a huge psychological barrier which makes it easier to simply cut their child and move on like nothing’s wrong. It also doesn’t help that men’s ego’s are strongly linked to their genitalia.

      • VeganGuyDebord [he/him,comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        I’ve talked to couples who are parents that said they circumsized their son just because they didn’t want their son to ask why their dick looked different from dad’s, and men who said they’ll circumsize their future sons just because they’re circumsized. But I’m not circumsized, and when my relationship with my girlfriend became more “serious” we sort of talked about having kids. And she said it would be up to my whether we would circumsize any of our sons or not, and I was just like “it’s not my penis, I’ll let them do whatever they want with it but I won’t make the decision to cut anything off”.

      • Kropotkins_Bread [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 years ago

        Yeah, this is bullshit. My sister, among others, mutilated both her sons because she thinks intact members look “gross.” I have heard similar sentiments, and their ensuing mutilations, from women in similar demos.

      • Phish [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 years ago

        Let’s be clear that not all fathers who circumcised their sons are driving a cycle of abuse. Especially not that long ago when it was just viewed as a normal thing many people did. These parents simply didn’t know better. They weren’t abusing their kids. They didn’t do it based on ego. It was just something you did with newborns.

        • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          I do sympathize with parents who didn’t know better, including my loving parents. The medical establishment is to blame. Nobody who chooses circumcision thinks they are abusing their son, nor are they criminally negligent. But I can’t say that someone who circumcises their son isn’t technically continuing the cycle. Also, sorry to hear about your son.

          • Phish [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 years ago

            Lol I don’t have kids and I’m not planning to. Just think people on here get a little extreme about the whole circumcision thing.

            • Amorphous [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 years ago

              i would hope people would be “a little extreme” about widespread, normalized infant genital mutilation

              you are the weird one for not being upset about it

            • Amorphous [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 years ago

              mutilating your child’s genitals without anesthetic for cosmetic reasons is abuse. if you disagree with that you’re fucking wrong.

              • Phish [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 years ago

                That’s the thing. A lot of parents didn’t do it for aesthetic reasons. They thought it was healthier. This is what I mean when I say people are extreme about it. You’re being completely hostile about it. The reality is it’s an unnecessary practice we should stop doing but it doesn’t negativity affect the lives of the vast majority of people it’s done to. Implying that every circumcised male in history was abused by their parents is ludicrous.

                • Amorphous [any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 years ago

                  mutilating your child’s genitals because you couldn’t be bothered to inform yourself about it is also abuse

                  imagine making this argument for literally any other form of abuse. hell, even any other form of mutilation. oh, yeah, i cut off the baby’s earlobes because, uhh … i get cysts in mine sometimes and thats kinda scary. earlobes must be bad.

                  and yes, im being hostile. we should be hostile toward INFANT GENITAL MUTILATION and those who support it.

      • star_wraith [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        That’s honestly a contradiction I’ve never thought of but it’s spot on.

        And really, circumcison is effectively irreversible. A lot of trans teens really just want puberty blockers, which is reversible (and now banned in the uk).

      • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 years ago

        I talk with people about sex all the time. I’m pretty confident I’m having the exact same experience as my uncircumcised brethren. No, I’m not less human. JFC, that’s a hot take.

        • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          In this three-minute video I achieve five orgasms (each with an ejaculation) over a period of less than two minutes, by stimulating my ridged band (which is pulled back and exposed on the shaft of my penis) with the thumb and index finger of my right hand. I do not touch my glans penis.

          NSFW video

          This, my friends, is the elusive male multiple orgasm — and the only way I can experience a multiple orgasm is by stimulating my ridged band. Men circumcised as children in the standard North American/Jewish style can never experience a ridged band orgasm or ridged band multiple orgasm, because the ridged band is fully amputated by the circumciser and can not be restored.

          Thank you for viewing my sample ridged band multiple orgasm video. Its purpose is to demonstrate to any reasonable person that the ridged band is the most sensitive and orgasmic part of the penis. My ridged band/O-ring makes major contributions to my sexual function, sexual sensation and orgasms, and the thought of a knife slicing it off makes my blood run cold. Circumcision of the foreskin, which always completely amputates the ridged band, is brutality, the theft of body parts, and the theft of a full sexual experience. If parents were properly educated about the anatomy, function and pleasure potential of the foreskin and its ridged band, they would not have their sons circumcised