• Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    Jim Farley could work for free and it would equate to about about $5 per unit cost reduction. Executives, believe it or not, make difficult decisions that impact billions in revenue. UAW members make no decisions and clock out at the end of their shift. They have a hard job and should be compensated fairly, but they are in no way the same as senior leadership.

    • LordR@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Difference is when managers fuck up they get a golden parachute, workers just get fired.

      No matter how hard you work or how many risks you’re responsible for, everything more than a million in earnimgs a year shouldn’t be allowed.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      UAW members make no decisions

      And who’s choice is that? I imagine most, if not all labor unions in the US would love to move toward a system of co-determination like they have in Germany.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codetermination_in_Germany

      A country that has been doing pretty well economically for the past several decades while the rest of the world was/is in flames.

    • Test_Tickles@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Jim Farley could work for free and still get more money per year than most other employees will make in their entire lifetime.