Google says bumpy Pixel 8 screens are nothing to worry about — Display ‘bumps’ are components pushing into the OLED panel::undefined

  • Justin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    183
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Sooo… don’t buy a Pixel 8 because of a design flaw is what I’m hearing? Thanks for responding, Google.

  • RedEye FlightControl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    7 months ago

    Don’t worry about those bumps in your hood. It’s just engine parts pushing into the sheet metal.

    But I want a perfect hood

    WE SAID DON’T WORRY ABOUT IT

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Bumps the size of those shown are pretty obviously a defect, because it distorts the image in a way that can not be reasonably expected for such a product, even if it’s only visible for a very keen eye, it can be returned by the customer under warranty.
    If Google should try to refute that, they will almost for sure lose any claims decision under EU or comparable law.

      • Zoolander@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        7 months ago

        Lemmy was already Reddit before the exodus. Lemmy users just have different interests so the bullshit is highly specific here.

        • Nommer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I left reddit due to the “um akshually” crowd that I’m starting to see here. Forgive me for not writing a 10 page essay as a reply and them trying to use information I ommited because it was barely relevant as a gotcha to prove they’re still somehow more correct than me.

          • Zoolander@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah, it tends to stir up more on here but I can’t tell if it’s actually more prevalent or if I just notice it here because the interactions are a lot more sparse than they were on Reddit. It may still be only 1 or 2 comments per topic but, when there’s only 20 comments total, it makes up a larger share of the comments than I would have noticed on Reddit amongst hundreds of comments.

      • LWD
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        deleted by creator

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        I saw those same comments and believe it’s either paid disinformation or complete morons operating off some paid disinformation they read somewhere else. This is inexcusable from a company as large as google plain and simple.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        One user claimed I was responsible for destroying the environment, because I said I wouldn’t tolerate the bumps

        That’s Blaming the victim. The ones destroying the environment are the ones making faulty products by design, and those that make products designed to fail. So in this scenario, the guilty party is clearly Google.

        I was dumb because the bumps “are not noticeable at all”

        Probably projection because he is not so smart himself.

        Congrats Lemmy on slowly turning into Reddit.

        I agree It happens more frequently now than ½ a year ago. But I don’t think we are quite there yet. Maybe it’s unavoidable on an open social media platform. It’s beginning to look that way IMO.

        Maybe we need a platform with steeper difficulty to entry? When reddit was new it was very good, I think it was in part because the design was pretty boring. That may have kept the people with the shortest attention span away.

        Maybe if Lemmy removed the thumbnail pictures for posts, I suspect that could help a lot.

      • Eh-I@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t want to shock you, but most Lemmy users were/are redditors. Just a weird coincidence.

  • hersh@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    7 months ago

    “no functional impact”? We clearly have very different ideas about the function of a display.

    It’s always something with Google, isn’t it?

  • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The “puncture marks” shown in the article are caused by some sort of grounding connectors/lever thingies, most likely for the capacitive touchscreen. So they aren’t some random “components” poking through.

  • LWD
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • vext01@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Phones are such a shitshow today. I feel like they are dreaming up gimmicks just to sell something new, when all along the conventional design was just fine.

      And stop anti-innovating. Give us back our SD slot and headphone jacks!

      • monk@lemmy.unboiled.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        My first communicator had an SD slot and a miniSD slot. This made copying photos from SD to SD harder than necessary, so I hoped it’d get better with time.

        Now, because of sPaCe CoNcErNs I don’t even get to have any card slot in my 14" laptop (only in my 10"one) a headphones jack in my 8" phone (only in my 3.5" one).

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Seriously. I don’t understand why everyone wants thinner phones…weight I get, but the thin-ness just makes it harder to hold.

      Give me a Gameboy sized phone, idgaf.

      • Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The weird thing is, I’m not sure any customers actually do care. it genuinely just feels like engineers finding ways to masturbate over how thin they can get something.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Time honored tradition. Wheel doesn’t fit in your lowered car? Add a bump like the Daytona. Turbo doesn’t fit in your hood? Add a bump like the eclipse.

    Ez

  • zeze
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    It looks like components inside the phone are pressing up against the back of the OLED display, resulting in visible bumps under the right lighting conditions.

    When the screen is turned off, not in use and in specific lighting conditions, some users may see impressions from components in the device that look like small bumps.

    The pictures and videos out there all involve people shining flashlights into a turned-off display, so it’s not the end of the world.

    It wasn’t noted in the video, but freeze-frame it and you’ll see some pretty alarming indents in the copper sheet on the back of the display that you can try to match up to the other half of the phone.

    It’s also strange that this happens only on some Pixel 8s, indicating it’s a QC issue and not some purposeful decision in the never-ending quest for device thinness.

    The tell-tale sign of this being an actual problem will be an OLED display that’s internally broken but doesn’t have a shattered glass cover.


    The original article contains 495 words, the summary contains 170 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!