I LOVE Alfonso Cuarón’s sci-fi action movie Children of Men. I’ve watched maybe six times and every time, the ending always almost brings me to tears. So when I learned it was adapted from P.D. James’ book of the same name, it was a no-brainer deciding what my next book would be.
After finishing the book, it wasn’t difficult to reach to the conclusion that I enjoyed the movie better.
While James’ book gives a more in-depth look at how human infertility and humanity’s slow death march towards extinction affects the sexual dynamic between men and women and almost demented ways humans try to cope with a world without children or a race of dead men walking, I feel the book dedicates WAY too much time describing the failing of human civilization and the Regrets and guilt of Theo Faron. It’s not even until after 2/3 through the book where it feels like the plot and story are properly paced and stuff of consequence actually begin to happen.
The film’s adaptation by, comparison, feels consistent in its pacing and the world building and woe-is-mes of Theo feel more compact a take up less of the audience’s time.
What books do you feel were worse than its film adaptation and why?
I guess I preferred the novel’s method of slowly doling that “she’s seeing something that hasn’t happened yet” information out to the movie’s, where the aliens tell her something that makes her “realize” kind of all at once so that humanity can help them in the future.
Like the way the movie does it makes it feel to some degree like a trick, like information was benig withheld by the audience - whereas the story does it gradually, so that at first you just think “something doesn’t add up here”, eventually you realize “okay yes there is something hidden in the context of this”, and then you gradually realize the truth over time. Not that the movie did it poorly, I liked the movie a lot, I just felt like the story “earned” that reveal via a slow burn in a way the movie didn’t.