• Nacktmull
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    So you admit they do not exist?

    • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      The technologies on which these reactor designs are based have been demonstrated previously. The specific designs are in progress and well on their way. AGR, EBR-II, and MSRE are examples.

        • Nacktmull
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          From how they argue, I get the impression that most of them are victims of astroturfing campaigns by the nuclear lobby tbh. The nuclear industry hates the idea to become redundant because of renewables, so they spread lies about being the solution to climate change. Like they ever gave any shits about the ecosystem, lol.

          • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Maybe, but I’ve had plenty of conversations where I’ve bought evidence, facts, used reliable sources, etc. and I see the same people still lying their asses off.

            • Nacktmull
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Maybe those are the ones running the astroturfing campaigns?

                • Nacktmull
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  More or less directly for the nuclear lobby I would assume. Or did I somehow misinterpret your question?