• bro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t align with either party, at all. I don’t like any candidates, and question if I’ll even bother voting.

    If I do vote, I would have to determine how much the negatives weigh down positives from any candidate, and I’m not sure yet if RFK’s BS runs too deep for me to stomach, compared to the few benefits he may offer. Those few benefits, though, are among my primary interests. At this point, he seems the best option to push for environmental protections and government transparency.

    Is he a loon? Yes, but I firmly believe all of our candidates are severely psychologically imbalanced.

    • RegularFodderOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      His belief is using a free market approach on the environment.

      • bro
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        True, and that may be the wrong approach. But from what I gather, he would be incentivizing and subsidizing tech like renewables to make them more attractive to the market. He would also push more litigation towards bad actors.

        I’m not convinced that anything else we’re doing or any other plans we have are going to work, so I’m ok with trying a well-managed free market route.