• joenforcer@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    If Korean culture places dogs on the list of eaten animals and it’s done in as human and sanitary condition as possible for farming the animals, then it’s not my place to try and stop them.

    What if I told you that dog slaughter is commonly done at the height of adrenaline, which intently means violence, due to the belief that it changes the flavor of the meat? Because that’s part of the practice. There’s nothing humane about it.

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      What if I told you that dog slaughter is commonly done at the height of adrenaline, which intently means violence, due to the belief that it changes the flavor of the meat? Because that’s part of the practice. There’s nothing humane about it.

      I stand by my previous post, that the farming of dogs for meat isn’t any more morally objectionable than farming of cows, which I do not find morally objectionable. However, as I stated, it should be done in as humane a way as possible (yes, I did have a typo and wrote “human” rather than “humane”). Taking what you claim at face value, the practice of killing an animal “at the height of adrenaline” strikes me as inhumane and that practice, in particular, I would be against.

    • KingOfSuede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not to argue in favor of eating dogs or anything, but I think posting a source would really help the claim you’re making.