• AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s a dangerous crossroads. The precedent would break this country…

    And 3 of the judges making the decision were appointed by the guy on trial. Clarence Thomas is openly corrupt. And I wouldn’t depend on Roberts for any my moral backbone.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve been pondering for a long time about how SCOTUS and more than 1/3 of the Senate could essentially take over the country over night. That case where they decided whether a state could overturn election results without federal interference gave me worry. But luckily most of them weren’t that radical. At least not right now.

    • Jaysyn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m sure they have no desire to give Dark Brandon carte blanche to whatever the fuck he wants to do.

      • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Of course not, but that’s not really how they think. They tend to do what’s best for them now, and then ignore the rules in the future when it hurts them.

        Rules for thee not for me.

        • Kainsley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Declaring that the sitting president can essentially act as a dictator is most definitely bad for them right now lol

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Clarence Thomas is openly corrupt. And I wouldn’t depend on Roberts for any my moral backbone.

      Right there ya go. OTOH, I don’t give a shit if he appointed them. They owe him nothing, he cannot do anything to them. It just doesn’t work that way.

      Afraid this might be a close one.