Why is the journalistic standard to embed tweets (xeets?) instead of using screenshots?

An embedded tweet can be deleted, and depends on X supporting the functionality. If editing is ever introduced on the platform, it would permanently break all past articles that don’t have an independent record of the tweet (such as a full quote in the article or a screenshot). X can potentially (and maybe does) embed tracking features.

It seems like there are a lot of good reasons not to use embedded tweets, but almost every news source does it this way. Is there a good reason why?

  • gregorum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    a hostile tantrum over a word they didn’t understand “makes sense to you?”

    clearly you’ve just come here to pick fights and troll, so your opinion holds little value.

      • gregorum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        “how dare you defend yourself against my attacks!”

        with that sort of absurd reasoning and bullying, you’re surprised i hold no value in your opinion? lmao

          • gregorum
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            you can’t even tell the difference between a disagreement and bullying, and you wonder why your opinion holds no value? lol

              • gregorum
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Reasonable people can disagree without tantrums and bullying. You can’t. And you wonder why your opinion hold no value? Lol