• brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I said pumping the breaks

    Doesn’t change anything about my point.

    There’s still legitimate concern for the removal of Hamas as the acting government of Gaza

    Incorrect. And you don’t see the USA sending endless, unconditional, military aid to Palestine so they can remove the Israeli government.

    Neither Hamas, nor the Netantahu backed Israeli government want a 2 state solution

    Hamas explicitly calls for a 2 state solution you lying ghoul.

    this remains the US states policy

    Not true, not until the US recognises the state of Palestine.

    Whoever can broker a deal that affirms a 2 state solution here will hopefully produce meaningful change towards this conflict.

    Going to be pretty hard to do while Isreal and the USA are committed to genocide.

    • ex10n
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      US aid is conditional to congressional support. Currently there’s debate on the issue at hand. Doesn’t remove the impact humanitarian aid has provided in the region. The 2 state solution has always been the desired solution here in the states. That position has been unwavering.

        • ex10n
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          No, but if you’d like to make that conclusion, it’s well within your right to do so. This is why I support our democratic process and the debate it garnishes!

        • ex10n
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The United States official policy is for a 2 state solution, I’m not sure how you can see it any other way. Feel free to present your arguments though!