• AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Not kind of. He showed up, he fought, he died. There’s no dimensions there. But he looked cool, had a new lightsaber, and was probably the first actor in Star Wars that actually knew how to fight IRL.

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      the first actor in Star Wars that actually knew how to fight IRL

      That also goes for Liam Neeson, who had already had a badass sword fight, check out his climactic duel versus Tim Roth in “Rob Roy”. In fact, I believe that scene was key in his being considered for the part of Qui-Gon, I remember it being said at the time.

    • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you watch the clone wars TV show (highly recommend) the character definitely has more depth than what was portrayed in the movies. If you’re interested in star wars character development. No better place to look than that show. You just have to suffer the first season a little bit. Since the series ages with it’s audience.

      • Acamon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        7 months ago

        You mean Christopher “that’s not the sound a man makes when he is knifed in the back” Lee?

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Fencing with a rapier is different from waving around something which cuts and burns through stuff without pressure with every side, and doesn’t have edges, and its resistance to movement stems not from gravity and aerodynamics, but from oxygen being burnt.

        Though that’s fans overthinking it, it’s not like lightsaber fighting in SW was ever logical.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          Fencing with a rapier is different from waving around something which cuts and burns through stuff without pressure with every side

          It’s actually closer to what Lightsaber dueling would be than the Kendo style used in most of Star Wars. The Light Saber has no mass and a single touch is incapacitating. So two handed hard chops like classic Luke are ridiculous. The rapier fencing technique to parry, thrust or slice quickly and lightly is ideal. You have a massless blade not a two handed clamore. You need only prick the opponent to severely harm them in the same way in fencing a touch, no matter how light, is a point for you.

    • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      He was the setup for the need to find the next sith, Darth Vader

      Unless my vague opinion doesn’t line up with Star Wars lore, in which case, retracted

      • shasta
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I was always confused because I thought Dooku (Darth Tyrannus) was Sidious’s apprentice. He’s the one who arranged the clones to start being made 20 years before episode 2. But that would mean Sidious had two apprentices. Did they know that? Was Maul just given a title to make him feel better but was always seen as disposable?

        • roscoe@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I never saw Maul as a real apprentice initiated into the mysteries of the sith, just someone trained to fight with the force, although Maul may have thought he was an apprentice. Dooku got the real sith training, hence the force lightning.

          All those inquisitors running around at other times aren’t sith, just force sensitive enforcers.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Imo rule of two was an unnecessary retcon of a line from Phantom. “Always two Sith are found together” didn’t have to mean ONLY two. It was to reflect that like Jedi Master and Jedi Padawan are always two Jedi found together, two Sith are always found together.

            Instead of seeing the symmetry that Lucas was so fond of (it’s like poetry), the EU ran with the line into an absurd history of how Sith developed into only 2 Sith in the entire Galaxy.

            The fact that there was Emperor, Dooku and Maul coexisting meant Lucas saw the Sith as the evil version of the Jedi.